Term Limits: Just My Opinion

Do they work? Can they work? How best should they be determined?
The one that I figure most are familiar with is the two-term limit on the President’s Office.

So if that has been a good idea since FDR, how is it this is only for one major office??
Some would argue term limits aren’t needed, as voting would (hopefully) be such an effective tool. But is that really? How can that be, when typical voters – on a very good turnout – only amount to about 35% of all of the registered voters (usually, per precinct).

This says to me that of the remaining 65% that could have voted, but didn’t, could actually have changed outcomes.

But here’s the rub. The most common reasons for not voting is due to – 1) my vote won’t matter, 2) I don’t like either of them, 3) I’m too busy, 4) he/she doesn’t get my vote because he/she (whatever the single reason is), 5) not interested.

I’m sure there are more reasons.

But does anyone consider that trying to convince others, friends and family members to go and vote might actually make a difference?

Or, perhaps those of us who regularly vote just wish there was more of a choice than what they have seen so far?

Maybe that’s exactly what we need.

This could turn into effective term limits. Just having enough civic minded friends and neighbors that decide to take the jump and run against someone. Maybe this is what we need more of. At both the local and federal levels of government.

This would be eminently practical, particularly considering the not-so-likely scenario of hoping to get legislation passed at any level to institute term limits for any elected position.

So. Short answer – we really need each other. And more of us & each other, to vote.
In the primaries especially, where the competition actually lives. (Before it gets whittled down to the, ahem, chosen few that will show up in the General election.)

Enough of that. Have a good evening and rest up for September 14th, 2010.

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: